Reparations- Rendering Race Relations Irreparable

Reparations- Rendering Race Relations Irreparable

It is a question worth asking, yet one which might surely stump the very best contestants on ABC’s Jeopardy, the popular TV game show hosted by Alex Trebec:

“Who was Sylvester Magee?”

Born to slaves named Ephraim and Jeanette, who worked on the J.J. Shanks Plantation in North Carolina, Sylvester Magee was later sold to one Hugh Magee, who owned the Lone Star Plantation in Covington County, Mississippi and there he worked as a field hand prior to enlisting in the Union Army in 1863. Twice wounded, Magee returned at war’s end an emancipated freedman. He lived to be well over 100 years old, but his age was uncertain beyond the fact that he was born sometime in the 1840s.

On October 15, 1971, Sylvester Magee, died in Columbia, Mississippi, the last known living former slave in the United States.

In the forty-seven years since Sylvester Magee passed away, the idea of paying descendants of American slaves reparations has bubbled up from time to time as a proposed antidote to ameliorate the legacy of slavery in the United States. Controversial at its core and increasingly difficult to equitably implement, reparations have nevertheless been the occasional card played by extremists on the political left in a dubious effort to sway the African-American voting bloc.

In this year of 2019, as a run-up to next year’s presidential election, Democrats seeking their party’s nomination are feverishly queueing up to kiss the hind quarters of the notorious race-baiter Al Sharpton (remember Tawana Brawley and the hoax Sharpton concocted to gain national exposure?) at his annual convention of his National Action Network. By promising to support and sign legislation providing for reparations to those claiming to be the descendants of slaves here in the United States, these pathetic politicians do so to gain Sharpton’s blessing and potential endorsement. As an aside, Representative Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) has even introduced legislation to for a “study group” to look into the possible payment of reparations.

Just a study group? Yeah, right.

Aside from the general argument of paying descendants of slaves (now, well into the fourth generation) compensation for the involuntary servitude to which their ancestors were subjected, the proposal would be utterly impossible to implement.

Why?

  • Well for instance, how would it be determined who would pay the actual reparations, aside from the U.S. Treasury? Would the payments be exacted from only the descendants of slave owners or from whites only? What about Caucasians who are descended from immigrants who came to this country in the decades following the American Civil War? Should they also have to pay?
  • Then again, how would it be determined who specifically would be paid reparations? Would such payments be limited to documented descendants of slaves once held in the United States, or to blacks, in general? What about African-Americans who are descended from immigrants who came to this country in the years following the American Civil War? Should they, too, be so entitled to receive these payments? What about individuals, like former President Barack Obama, whose father was a Kenyan national and whose mother was a white American? Would individuals of similar lineage qualify to receive such benefits?

Implementation issues aside, the idea of compensating the descendants of U.S. slaves for what happened to their great grandparents, and great-great grandparents, is nothing more than cheap and exploitative means to trick African-American voters into staying on the political plantation known as the Democrat Party- a party which has really done nothing to improve the lives of African-Americans since the 1960s. Worse, to take money from one person and give this money to another, all in the name of retrospective recompense, constitutes government-forced redistribution in its worst form, and reinforces the stereotype that, somehow, black folks are incapable of improving their own lives without government assistance.

If that’s not racist, then what the hell is?

No one worthy of respect would deny that the institution of slavery in the United States was an injustice of the worst kind in our country’s history. Just as certain, no one in their right mind would dare say that race relations, in general, and the civil rights and opportunities for African-Americans, specifically, have not significantly improved since the 1950s…

…that is, unless they are race-baiters like Al Sharpton, who make their ill-begotten gains by exploiting the emotions of those of his own race and by extorting the putative political “guilt” of liberal whites and other politicians seeking his imprimatur.

To opportunists like Sharpton, and the politicians who seek his favor, “race” is nothing more than a commodity to be played in the open market of ideas, thanks to the media attention that he gains every time he opens his mouth.

Perhaps, we have not quite realized the oft-quoted dream of Martin Luther King, Jr., who longed for the day when people would be judged, not by color of their skin, but rather by the content of their character…a day when blacks and whites could sit down in fellowship, together at a table of perfect racial harmony, and join hands…

…and nothing would ensure that this dream will never come to pass, and would thus render race relations forever irreparable, than the forced payment of reparations to a select group of citizens who have never known the injustice of slavery in their own lifetimes.

That time passed with the passing of Sylvester Magee, forty-seven years ago.

-Drew Nickell, 8 April 2019

© 2019 by Drew Nickell, all rights reserved.

author of “Bending Your Ear- a Collection of Essays on the Issues of Our Times”

now available at Amazon

Signed and personalized editions now available at my website:

http://www.drewnickell.com

Follow my postings on the RSS feed: http://www.drewnickell.com/?feed=rss2

Double Standards- Alive and Well in the Age of Donald Trump

Double Standards- Alive and Well in the Age of Donald Trump

If a “double standard” was a sandwich at the West Wing Café (one of Washington DC’s best places to grab a sandwich and just two blocks from the U. S. Capitol), it would be a hands-down favorite for Democrats and their Republican collaborators in the House and Senate.  The same holds true for their cohorts across the mainstream media, who apply a “double standard” with reckless abandon, especially when it comes to matters concerning inappropriate sexual behavior.

Take for instance the extremely broad leeway that politicians from both parties are giving former Vice President Joe Biden. For years there have been a multitude of memes concerning “Creepy Uncle Joe,” and there is ample evidence in the form of too many video clips to count that the former VP and longtime Senator from Delaware takes affection towards females of all ages to an unusual extreme.

“Oh, that’s just Joe being Joe…”

Isn’t that what we always hear whenever the former vice president puts his foot in his mouth or, not to mention, whenever his hands and face get a little too close to the ladies for comfort?

Imagine, just for a moment, that instead of Joe Biden being in all of those video clips, it was President Donald Trump. If you think that his recorded conversation with Billy Bush on the NBC show Access Hollywood from 2005 caused a stir in October of 2016, nothing would compare to the absolute outrage that would occur if Trump was the subject of all of the “Creepy Uncle Joe” memes and clips.

Why, Democrats and Republicans in the House and Senate would immediately impeach President Trump if ever such videos of him were found, but strangely, they are willing to give Biden a pass.

Biden himself went on the air and tried to convince viewers that he now “get’s it” about the “changing standards of personal space,” or some such rot, and all of the media marveled at the man’s sincerity.

Yeah, right.

The only thing is that I don’t recall other past politicos being so habitually prone to such closeness, which seems to stretch beyond the comfort of the female recipient. Granted, Presidents Roosevelt, Kennedy and Clinton all had their extra-curricular relationships with women, but these dalliances were off-camera and went largely unreported by a sympathetic press.

Biden, on the other hand, has set off a cottage industry of “Creepy Uncle Joe” commentary and yet the “experts” and D.C. insiders all tell us to “get a grip” and, even in some cases, caution us about the sad passing of a time when demonstrable affection was once within the scope of acceptable behavior from politicians. Again, I am hard-pressed to think of another politician who sniffed the hair of women and routinely kissed them as though they were family members or even close friends.

Come to think about it, if I acted like Joe Biden at an intimate dinner party with my very closest of friends, I am almost certain that their husbands would be as put off with my behavior as my wife would doubtlessly be.

While no one is suggesting that Joe Biden’s behavior rises to the level of sexual assault, there is also little doubt that his seemingly-lecherous entreaties tend to be the habitual way he interacts with unsuspecting females, and his boorish behavior obviously places them ill-at-ease.

Biden’s excuse of “the changing standards of personal space” is not unlike the excuse that Democrat Virginia Governor Ralph Northam used when trying to rationalize a 1984 Eastern Virginia Medical School yearbook photo of him in blackface.   The Governor said that he was cognizant of the fact that “sensitivities concerning such depictions have changed since the time the photo was taken.”

I recall that a fraternity brother of mine once showed up at a 1979 costume party donning blackface, and he was told to leave and wash it off his face before returning, so obviously Northam’s explanation, like Biden’s, was a total crock of bulls*#t.

In neither case, did the offending politician ever offer an apology. Instead, they tried to side-step their behavior with pathetic rationalization and lame excuses. Being a Democrat, or any liberal, means never having to say you’re sorry. Apologies after all are only expected from Trump, his supporters (for even supporting him) and conservatives, in general.

Again, imagine the reaction if a photograph of Donald Trump wearing blackface ever surfaced…he’d already be out of office. Yet, Virginia Governor Northam will remain in office until his term runs out in January of 2021.

If that strikes a chord of outrage, consider the fact that Northam’s Democrat Lieutenant Governor, Justin Fairfax, remains in office despite two very credible and documented claims of sexual assault made by two different women concerning incidents that took place in the last decade.

So, while all of the mainstream media lectures us about giving Joe Biden some slack regarding his past behavior, it was President Donald Trump himself who, knowing all-too-well what accusations of personal misconduct can do, offered the best commentary directed towards the former Vice President:

“All I can say, is welcome to the world, Joe. Are you having a good time, Joe? Are you having a good time?”

President Trump should be so lucky to enjoy the allowances that are routinely given to “Creepy Uncle Joe.”

Then again, the double standards of political correctness is the very sandwich that is irresistible to politicians and pundits, alike.

-Drew Nickell, 4 April 2019

© 2019 by Drew Nickell, all rights reserved.

author of “Bending Your Ear- a Collection of Essays on the Issues of Our Times”

now available at Amazon

Signed and personalized editions now available at my website:

http://www.drewnickell.com

Follow my postings on the RSS feed: http://www.drewnickell.com/?feed=rss2